1 Name: Anonymous : 2017-07-09 10:05

1 uses "they" instead of "he" to refer to a single person when which of the two genders the person is has not been determined
2 asks passive-aggressive faux-naive questions to try and show somebody is wrong instead of coming out and directly disagreeing
3 well you get the picture with those two. The point is: this 26ch has too many cucks rn.

2 Name: Anonymous : 2017-07-09 13:58

4. Making useless threads and wasting valuable bytes.

3 Name: Anonymous : 2017-07-09 17:50

5. Making claims without any examples or proof

4 Name: Anonymous : 2017-07-10 07:12

Isn't stating that there are no examples or proof itself an example of a claim with no proof?

5 Name: Anonymous : 2017-07-10 07:30

Definitions of words are more of an agreed upon thing. If people agree, they can define cuck to be whatever they want and they will understand what it means. So while >>1's definition of cuck are points 1 and 2, the claim in point 3 hasn't been given any evidence. Point number 5 is simply a point that someone might include in their definition of the word "cuck".

6 Name: Anonymous : 2017-07-10 13:06

My proof is this thread

7 Name: Anonymous : 2017-07-11 11:37

Why do threads like this always seem to be law enforcement and/or someone affiliated with them trolling for information?

Sorry guys, you're just a little too transparent.

8 Name: Anonymous : 2017-07-11 21:32

Yeah law enforcement definitely wants information from a bunch of anonymous posters on an obscure website.

9 Name: Anonymous : 2017-07-15 19:04

>26ch has too many cucks

Goatfinger has more.

10 Name: Anonymous : 2017-07-20 19:41

Goatfinger is a strange place, it seems as though their very own users hate the board. I really can't tell what any of the threads are on about, either.

11 Name: Anonymous : 2017-07-22 10:59

cuck my dubs

12 Name: Anonymous : 2017-07-23 19:51

pts 1 and 2 are on the nose

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...